How AI simplify SAP S/4HANA upgrades
S/4HANA upgrades are complex and time-critical. See how AI reduces guesswork, identifies risks early, and keeps upgrades on track.
Prepare for your SAP S/4HANA upgrade before 2027. Explore migration options, deployment models, and download the roadmap guide to start planning today.
The approaching end of mainstream maintenance for SAP ECC and SAP Business Suite 7 on December 31, 2027, with optional extended maintenance (subject to additional fees) until 2030, makes migration to SAP S/4HANA a critical strategic decision for enterprises. Organizations that remain on ECC risk increased costs, limited innovation, and reduced vendor support beyond this timeline.
For large enterprises, the scale of historical data, extensive custom code, and deeply integrated business processes can make system conversions complex and time-intensive. When planning is delayed, organizations risk narrowing their execution window, leaving insufficient time for proper testing, validation, and change management—ultimately increasing the likelihood of errors, and potentially disrupting core operations.
For CIOs, IT leaders, and SAP teams, the challenge is no longer whether to migrate, but how to design a structured, risk-aware SAP S/4HANA upgrade and migration strategy that protects business continuity, maintains compliance, and positions the enterprise for long-term value creation.
This enterprise guide outlines the strategic considerations, deployment options, migration approaches, business case elements, and risk factors organizations must evaluate to prepare for SAP S/4HANA before 2027.
SAP S/4HANA Deployment Options
SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition
SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition
What are the migration options for SAP S/4HANA?
Brownfield (System Conversion)
Greenfield (New Implementation)
Selective Data Transition (SDT)
How to build the business case for SAP S/4HANA
1. Risk avoidance and compliance exposure
2. Operational efficiency and process optimization
3. IT cost structure and infrastructure strategy
4. Innovation enablement and competitive positioning
SAP S/4HANA is SAP’s next-generation enterprise resource planning (ERP) suite, built natively on the SAP HANA in-memory database to deliver real-time processing, simplified data models, and an improved user experience through SAP Fiori. It is designed to support end-to-end business processes across finance, supply chain, sales, manufacturing, procurement, and service, while enabling advanced analytics, embedded AI, and automation capabilities critical to digital transformation.
To meet different business needs and deployment preferences, SAP offers multiple versions and operating models of S/4HANA. Each has its own trade-offs in terms of control, flexibility, upgrade cadence, customizability, and total cost of ownership.
Selecting the right SAP S/4HANA deployment model is a foundational decision that influences cost structure, customization flexibility, upgrade cadence, and long-term operational control. Enterprises can select from four primary deployment options, each providing a distinct balance of control, flexibility, and operational responsibility.
The on-premise edition is the traditional deployment model in which the ERP system runs on infrastructure managed by the enterprise or its chosen hosting provider.
This option provides the highest level of control over system configuration, custom developments, integrations, security policies, and upgrade timing. Organizations determine when to apply enhancement packs, feature updates, and support packages, allowing alignment with internal governance and release cycles.
On-premise deployment is typically selected by enterprises with complex system landscapes, heavy customization requirements, strict regulatory constraints, or established internal SAP operations teams.
SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition is a multi-tenant Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) ERP solution hosted and operated entirely by SAP.
SAP manages infrastructure, technical operations, security patches, and upgrades. The solution follows a standardized “fit-to-standard” model based on SAP best practices, with automatic updates delivered on a quarterly release cycle.
Because SAP controls the upgrade cadence, organizations benefit from rapid innovation and lower infrastructure responsibility. However, customization flexibility is limited, and enterprises must adapt to SAP’s predefined processes and release timelines.
Public Edition is best suited for organizations prioritizing standardization, speed of deployment, and reduced operational overhead.
SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition is a single-tenant cloud deployment model that delivers the full functional scope of the traditional on-premise edition within a subscription-based commercial framework.
It is typically deployed in hyperscaler environments (such as Azure, AWS, or Google Cloud) or SAP-managed infrastructure under the RISE with SAP commercial model.
Compared to the Public Edition, Private Edition provides significantly greater customization flexibility, broader industry functionality, and more control over upgrade scheduling. While updates still follow SAP’s release strategy, enterprises can plan upgrade cycles with more flexibility than in the multi-tenant model.
Although infrastructure management shifts to SAP and hyperscaler providers, organizations remain responsible for:
Private Edition is commonly selected by large enterprises seeking cloud operating benefits while preserving complex processes and customization requirements.
Choosing the right migration approach is one of the most important strategic decisions in an SAP S/4HANA upgrade. The selected path determines project complexity, cost, timeline, risk exposure, and the level of business transformation achieved.
SAP defines three primary migration approaches: Brownfield, Greenfield, and Selective Data Transition (SDT).
Each option serves a different enterprise objective.
Brownfield is a technical system conversion that transforms an existing SAP ECC system into SAP S/4HANA while preserving historical data, configurations, and business processes.
Key characteristics:
Best suited for:
Brownfield is often selected when the goal is modernization with minimal operational disruption.
Greenfield involves implementing SAP S/4HANA as a new system from scratch, allowing organizations to redesign business processes using SAP best practices.
Key characteristics:
Best suited for:
Greenfield is often selected when business transformation, process standardization, and long-term innovation are top strategic priorities.
SDT combines elements of brownfield and greenfield approaches.
Key characteristics:
Best suited for:
The optimal approach depends on system complexity, customization levels, regulatory requirements, and business objectives.
SDT is often selected by enterprises seeking to balance risk mitigation with selective transformation, preserving valuable historical data while modernizing targeted business processes.
For large enterprises, SAP S/4HANA migration is rarely driven by technical justification alone. Executive stakeholders require a clear, measurable business case that justifies investment, outlines risk exposure, and defines long-term value.
A compelling business case for SAP S/4HANA migration typically includes five key considerations:
With mainstream maintenance for SAP ECC ending in 2027, organizations that remain on legacy systems face rising extended maintenance costs, increased security and compliance exposure, reduced access to innovation from SAP, and growing challenges in sourcing skilled resources to support legacy systems. Clearly quantifying the financial and operational impact of delaying migration helps executive leadership understand not only the investment required to move forward, but also the escalating cost and risk of inaction.
SAP S/4HANA’s simplified data model and embedded analytics enable faster financial close cycles, improved inventory visibility, real-time reporting and forecasting, and reduced data redundancy across business functions. When building the business case, enterprises should quantify expected productivity gains, reductions in manual effort, and improvements in decision-making speed to demonstrate measurable operational impact and return on investment.
Migration provides an opportunity to reassess infrastructure and operating models, including decisions between on-premise, cloud, or RISE with SAP deployments, as well as the shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) to operational expenditure (OpEx). It also allows organizations to reduce legacy system maintenance burdens and consolidate fragmented system landscapes. A structured total cost of ownership (TCO) analysis over a five- to ten-year horizon often reveals long-term financial efficiencies that extend well beyond the initial implementation investment.
SAP S/4HANA serves as a foundation for embedded AI and automation, advanced analytics and predictive insights, seamless integration with modern cloud ecosystems, and continuous innovation through regular feature updates. When building the business case, enterprises should look beyond cost reduction and consider how S/4HANA can enable revenue growth, improve customer experience, and strengthen long-term competitive differentiation.
For enterprises already advancing digital transformation, supply chain modernization, or global process standardization initiatives, SAP S/4HANA migration can serve as the foundational platform that unifies and accelerates these efforts. Positioning the ERP transition as a strategic enabler—rather than a standalone IT project—strengthens executive sponsorship, secures cross-functional alignment, and increases organizational commitment to long-term transformation outcomes.
The duration of an enterprise SAP S/4HANA upgrade and migration depends on system complexity, customization levels, data quality, and transformation scope.
In general:
However, timelines are rarely driven by technical conversion alone. The most significant variables include:
Many enterprises underestimate the planning effort required before execution even begins. Delays often occur not during the conversion itself, but during preparation, governance alignment, and cross-functional coordination.
With the 2027 maintenance deadline approaching, organizations that start early gain flexibility in sequencing activities, reducing downtime exposure, and avoiding compressed project timelines.
A structured, phased roadmap is necessary to accurately estimate duration, allocate resources, and manage risk across the entire migration lifecycle.
Download the SAP S/4HANA Upgrade & Migration Roadmap to access a detailed planning framework and executive roadmap designed to help enterprises navigate the transition before 2027.
Prepare for your SAP S/4HANA upgrade with a structured, enterprise-ready roadmap.
SAP S/4HANA is SAP’s next-generation ERP suite built on the HANA in-memory database. Compared to ECC, it offers a simplified data model, real-time analytics, enhanced user experience (SAP Fiori), embedded automation, and improved integration capabilities. ECC relies on legacy architecture and does not support SAP’s long-term innovation roadmap.
Migration timelines vary based on system complexity and business scope. Mid-sized enterprises typically require 9–18 months, while large, highly customized environments may take 18–36+ months. Early planning significantly improves timeline control and risk management.
An SAP S/4HANA readiness assessment evaluates system landscape complexity, custom code volume, data quality, integration dependencies, and infrastructure requirements. It helps enterprises determine migration effort, risk exposure, and the most suitable transition approach before committing to a timeline.
Enterprises typically use SAP tools such as SAP Readiness Check, ABAP Test Cockpit (ATC) with S/4HANA simplification checks, and usage analysis tools to evaluate custom code compatibility. During the migration process, the Custom Code Migration App in SAP S/4HANA helps track and manage remediation activities. Identifying unused, obsolete, or incompatible customizations early reduces remediation effort, improves timeline accuracy, and helps prevent delays during system conversion.
While not legally mandatory, migrating to S/4HANA is strategically necessary for organizations that wish to remain on SAP’s long-term innovation roadmap beyond 2027–2030 support timelines.
S/4HANA upgrades are complex and time-critical. See how AI reduces guesswork, identifies risks early, and keeps upgrades on track.
SAP S/4HANA upgrade testing guide covering strategy, risk-based planning, automation, performance testing, and tools to ensure a smooth, low-risk...
SAP S/4HANA Monitoring by IT-Conductor with powerful features that saves customers up to 90% of time & cost from SAP App Center to Monitor HANA